Reading for Monday, November 29th

Being a very analytical person, I sometimes "over-think" things and read too much into them. Well, the author to "Unlearning the Myths that Bind Us: Critiquing Cartoons and Society," is being just that---too critical and analytical. I don't think it's fair to say that disney movies are implanting these sterotypes in our children's minds. Yes, the author makes a valid point that the disney princesses are usually one race with one specific body type, but there are other elements within the disney movies that should be celebrated and not critiqued. How about those awesome songs that inspire children to sing, dance, and play instruments? When I got a keyboard for christmas in middle school, one of the first pieces of sheet music that I bought was "Colors of the Wind" from Pocahontas. Now, do you think that I sat there analyzing the movie about the characters' body types, social class, or gender roles? No. The only thing I really remembered from the movie was the cute/funny animals and catchy songs. Most kids are like that. Most kids take away and remember the positive aspects of the movies. I don't think most children get their education on values and ethics from the cartoons they watch or the fairy tales they read. They are influenced by their parents, friends, neighbors, teachers, etc. There are other role models out there that make a greater impact on children's lives. Maybe we should be critiquing those kinds of role models and let fairy tales and children's stories remain just that---tales and stories!

Readings for Monday, November 15th

I loved the article "Multimodal Texts: What They Are and How Children Use Them" by Bearne. I agree with the author that "the idea of 'text' is being redefined." Besides words, children use images to make meaning and create understanding, which is why technology is becoming such a driving force within education. For instance, we are writing a blog in a college course. I never would have expected this to happen. But, time are changing and so as teachers, we need to facilitate this change and welcome it with open arms. We should learn more about the different ways children acquire knowledge whether that is by reading books, watching TV, or playing video games. In order to be an effective teacher, we need to understand this new definition of "text" and figure out a way how we can incorporate these methods into our teaching.

Monday, November 8th: MGRP Reflection

Reflection

            The multigenre research paper was a challenge for me in the beginning. Because there are so many critical issues facing education today, I found it difficult just picking one topic. The process I used to finally narrow down my research topic was very similar to the writing process that we teach to our students. I created a list of topics that I found interesting; however, I had to then narrow it down to those topics that directly influence my future teaching. Because of my background in music, I’ve always had a passion for incorporating the arts within a standard elementary classroom curriculum. Because of my prior experiences in the arts, it was exciting to read research articles that discussed essential questions such as, “What is arts integration,” “Why is arts integration important,” and “How can teachers integrate the arts in a meaningful way.” Once I uncovered these essential questions through my research, I was able to begin my inquiry process. Those three questions generated even more questions pertinent to the application of the arts within a literacy program. The multigenre research project allowed me to experience the inquiry and writing process at an entirely different level. I had to gather data and organize it in such a way to support my argument about the importance of arts integration. I plan to save all of my research articles for my future teaching because they provided me with many ideas on using music, art, drama, and dance to enhance literacy learning.

Monday, November 1st Post

Why didn't my middle school/high school require us to read Seedfolks? I asked myself that question once I finished reading the book. I loved how each character was so different yet they were all united by the garden in the lot. There was that central unifying link bringing various ethnicities, cultures, ages, and genders all together into one envrionment. Young adults need to learn that there is something bigger than ourselves out there in the world. Yes, we all have our problems and tend to focus on our needs and wants, but what I love about this book is that it shows young adults that there IS something bigger to focus on---the lot. The lot stands for so many things such as teamwork, friendship, respect, responsibility, etc. These are the bigger ideas and values that children should be focusing on --the big picture!

Monday, October 25th Post

I thought that Van Sluys' article on how to set up an invitation within your classroom was very informative. It is very important for the teacher to know how to create an appropriate classroom environment which would facilitate student engagement and learning. It all boils down to the teacher's role in preparation and planning. The author gives a teacher specific considerations in order to create an environment for invitations such as 1) Make time for invitations 2) Create productive workspaces 3) Organize invitations and related materials 4)Design written invitations that honor the requisite properties 5) Give students choices about invitations to pursue 6) Establish sign-up procedures 7) Make invitations interesting and engaging 8) Build in opportunities for relflection 9) Allow students to share their thinking, experiences, insights, and processes. I think the 8th topic about reflection is very important and I love how the author included examples of reflection forms and learning logs. In order to set up an effective and successful invitation, the teacher needs to carefully consider the students' interests, plan ahead with all necessary materials, and be organized.

Monday, October 18th Post

For this week, we had to read chapters out of the MGRP book and "The Donut House" by Powell and Davidson. I found the article written by Powell and Davidson to be very interesting. I would never think as a teacher to take a class field trip to a local donut shop. First off, I'd be worried about the liability of walking there and then how I'd have to make sure that no one ran off and/or got hurt. Thankfully, the Kindergarten teacher in the article knew to get parent permission slips. But, such an experience is definitely worth all of the headache of getting such a field trip organized. I loved how the article talked about the benefits of situated literacy compared to the traditional schooled literacy approach. The article mentioned, "Children are more engaged in learning when they perceive an authentic purpose for their efforts." Not only did the Kindergarten create situated literacy learning within her classroom, but she also made sure that they kids collaborated with members/business oweners within their local community. Not only was this literacy project authentic, but it was also culturally relevant, which increases and motivates student understanding.

Reflection on Writing Workshops

I've never considered myself a very good writer. I found it time-consuming and exhausting but that's probably because I am a bit of a perfectionist and would spend hours revising just one simple little sentence. In high school, I used to take pride in editing my brother's papers for grammar and spelling mistakes. Keep in mind that I was the little sister pointing out my big brother's mistakes. You can assume that I took great pleasure in this experience. To this day, my brother's grammar is god-awful; however, who is the one writing 3-4 papers PER WEEK in his PhD program and reading 30 novels in one semester? - my brother! So, even though I was the one fixing his mistakes, he was the one utilizing his creativity and putting his ideas onto paper. You see, I never liked to take that risk because I enjoyed the role of "editor" more so than the role of "writer." So, while my brother is cranking out paper after paper like it's second-nature to him, I am sweating at just the thought of having to write a MGRP this semester. If only I would have taken that risk and tried expressing my ideas onto paper more often as a child, then maybe I would feel comfortable and confident enough to call myself a "writer" as an adult.

So, the point of this whole little summary about my writing history is that now I am yet again assuming my role as "editor" in my field experience. Even though we've only had two days in our field placements, I have already done two writing conferences. For my very first writing conference, the classroom teacher  just kinda threw me into it. I had barely enough time to even read my "instructions" on how to edit the students' papers. So, there I was---feeling very unprepared and about to make or break a child's confidence as a young writer. It wasn't easy trying to keep my perfectionistic "Mr. Hyde-type" personality locked deep inside my head. I kept thinking to myself, "For a second grader, shouldn't he know the difference between 'Jim' and 'Gym?" I mean, it's logical that a young boy would like 'Jim' class and for all things considered, the spelling does make sense. So, how was I supposed to explain that the word starts with a "g" and has a magic "y" in the middle that sometimes makes the short /i/ sound???? I can only imagine how confusing the sound of "y" might be for a child. Sometimes you slap "y" on the end of a word to make the long /e/ sound but then...oh wait...now we can use it in the middle of a word for the short /i/ sound? How confusing! So, I tried focusing on content rather than grammar. It's hard giving recommendations to a stubborn 2nd grader who is absolutely, 100% positive that he wants to have the word "And" at the beginning of every sentence! Obviously, I know that as I continue having writing conferences, I will become more comfortable and confident giving young writers praise and suggestions for improvement.

Crafting Writers: Chapters 10 - 12

Conferences are a good way to assess the students' writing development and progress; however, sometimes it is tricky trying to find time during the school day in order to have those conferences. Now, if you have a teacher assistant or a parent volunteer, then yeah, of course you will be able to do independent conferences with each student. But, sometimes, you have to adapt and deal with the situation at hand - hence, why group conferences are an effective compromise.

Now, as the teacher, it's better to start with praising the student for what they did well in their writing. Let's say for instance that the student utilized one of the crafts we've been studying in their paper. We could praise the student for having a strong voice or descriptive, specific examples to support their story. Once you have told the student what is good about the writing, then you can address what they need to work on. By providing constructive criticism, the teacher is guiding the student during the entire writing process. After the initial draft, the student focuses on specific craft techniques to include or improve in their writing. It is important for the teacher to approach the revision as something that CAN be accomplished. The student should never feel like the teacher is criticizing their writing with no room to improve. There is always room for improvement and as the teacher, we need to pave the way.

Crafting Writers: Chapters 7-9, Appendix F

While reading Crafting Writers, it's so easy to relate what Hale is talking about to my prior teaching observations. I've observed the "Turn and Talk" Try-it technique before and I remember it being pretty effective. Of course, I didn't know the technical name for it until just now. During my observation, I saw a fourth grade teacher reading to the class and after a few paragraphs, she would pause and have the students "turn and talk" to someone sitting next to them. After a few minutes, she would have them share. It was the spitting image of what Hale was describing in Chapter 6. Who knew that I would be learning about this technique after seeing it in practice one year later. I loved what Lucy Calkins said about direct instruction, which Hale quotes on page 103--"The fact that we, as teachers, say something has very little to do with whether our children learn it. Telling is not teaching." I agree with Hale that teacher directed instruction has a poor reputation; but just like Hale, I believe that it can be effective. I always loved direct instruction, probably because I was in control and there wasn't chaos going on around me, but also because I could observe how each kids responded to what I was teaching in the exact moment. With all eyes on me, I could see if they were understanding and following along, or if they were drifting off into space and staring out the window. But, Hale raises a good question....Just because the eyes are on me, doesn't mean that the student is comprehending what I am teaching. So---voila! She comes up with a solution. After a short mini-lesson, we should let the students "try-it." This reminds me of something I learned in music methods....the "Prepare, Present, Practice" technique. Basically, I would teach a short concept and then let the kids practice it on their own. By allowing them to practice what I had just presented, it is solidifying the concept into their skulls. Then the next time we would have music class, I would "prepare" my lesson topic by connecting the new concept to something the kids have already learned; thus, I am spiraling in new concepts and connecting them with prior knowledge. After I slowly prepare the students by connecting it with prior knowledge, then I present my new concept using teacher-led direct instruction, afterwards, letting them practice it on their own. Voila! The "Prepare, Present, Practice" technique! This is basically the same thing that Hale talks about on pg 97 with her "Mini-lesson, Try-it, Independent Writing, Share" method, but it's a new way to think about it. (Remember the three P's!).

Crafting Writers Chapters 1-6

My dad always loved to give me the advice, "Success is the result of ten thousand small jobs each done well." I have no idea if he made this up on his own or stole the phrase from some author; however, the source of the phrase isn't the point. The point of that phrase is how it demonstrates to a child that it takes many smaller steps in order to reach the final result- a final piece of writing. In Crafting Writers, I loved how the author emphasizes how important it is for us as teachers to not always focus on the end product. It's so important for us to describe each of the "ten thousand small steps" needed in order to have "voice" in our writing. The author states, "We need to show students many specific craft techniques they can choose from that will add up to voice and descriptive writing" (pg 9). Those specific craft techniques are the tools that we place in each child's tool box. Each child will carry that tool box along with them for many years after elementary school--some may even carry that tool box with them for the rest of their lives. We need to help students along their journey as writers, providing specific smaller skills that will help them along their journey. Can you imagine Dorothy ever reaching The Wizard of Oz if she wouldn't have had Scarecrow, Tin Man, and Lion joining her along the way? She needed each friend (a different craft technique) to help her progress along her journey. Notice how each friend were added on along the way. All three friends didn't jump out onto the yellow brick road at the same exact time (how overwhelming that would be). Instead, each friend was gradually introduced before another friend came along. Dorothy got used to Scarecrow before she had to then learn the ways of Tin Man. Each skill must be layered as the process continues. Just because Tin Man shows up, doesn't mean that Dorothy should completely abandon Scarecrow. So, just because a young writer learns about punctuation, doesn't mean he or she should entirely abandon other craft techniques. So, as teachers we must remember that the kids know the end result that is in sight...it's so close that they can almost touch it...but it's our job to show them HOW TO GET THERE!

Cusumano/Sound Systems Response

As the daughter of a retired Kindergarten teacher, I was lucky to have a home environment furnished with big books (that often came with songs on cassette tapes), phonetic flash cards, and other educational resources. Of course, at the time, I had no idea how lucky I was to have all of my mom's teaching resources she used for her Kindergarten class at my disposal. It wasn't until I read the chapters in Sound Systems did I realize the purpose of those big books. Of course they weren't designed so that the pictures could be bigger but they had a more educational purpose- to include the entire class in on a shared reading experience. I loved how the textbook reinforced the important of rereading literary materails. It makes perfect sense that the kids would be able to learn more if the teacher kept using familiar materials. During my teaching experience in the music classroom, I would always revisit some familiar songs but I would address different concepts each time. It's the same with reading! I loved seeing the connection between teaching music and teaching phonics. The other day I was substituting in a Kindergarten class and I did shared reading with the kids. I decided to pull out of my favorite books from elementary school- "Chicka, Chicka, Boom, Boom." Immediately as I began reading the book to the class, I was not the only one reading. The entire class was practically singing along as I turned each page. I thought it was wonderful how they had practically memorized the book. Since the kids knew the book so well, I could stop and ask them questions about what they saw on the page (in the illustrations) and how that related to the text. Just how Cusumano described how important it is to have a "word repertoire," these Kindergarten kids had memorized a set of words from a book. It was wonderful seeing the connections the kids made because these connections from Chicka Chicka Boom Boom will help them in their lessons on phonics.

Literacy Dig: An Artsy Atmosphere

On Saturday, September 4th, my group members and I went to a local arts fair. We were all very excited to see how literacy plays a part in a community arts event. When we split up the responsibilities, my role was to gather and record evidence of literacy. For 30 minutes, I went around the booths within a specific street corner and gathered pamphlets, flyers, business cards, magazines, and other forms of physical print. It was also my role to investigate how reading and writing functioned within the arts envrionment. I had to ask myself many questions while observing the environment: Were words really necessary in order to navigate around the fair? Did the community members use literacy in order to purchase food, drinks, and artistic items for sale? How could an illiterate person function within the arts fair and what accomodations were available, allowing them to blend in within a "normal," high-functioning society?

As I went around to the different booths, I noticed that "words" were not very visible. Most of the signs that did contain words were displayed in very small font. In order for a person to understand what the booth was advertising, they could not tell from a distance, but would have to walk up in front of the sellers and read the tiny signs. However, that is assuming the people actually used the words on the signs to identify what the booths were selling. Most people, from what I observed, did not read the signs at all. While navigating around the fair, a person would use their sense of smell in order to find where the food booths were located. Or if a person wanted to buy a large ceramic clock, then they would see it visually from a distance. It was not necessary for them to go up to each individual booth and read the tiny sign in order to find out the booths' primary purpose. Also, let's say that a person did not see or smell what they were looking for, then maybe they could use listening skills in order to navigate around the fair. It was not necessary to read the tiny "Thai Food" sign when people were verbally saying things like "the food is over by the music." Even if that person could not read or write, they could still find "Thai Food." Now, I did observe how sometimes literacy would make a difference but only if a person drove to the fair. There were signs reading "No Parking" posted on the street corners. I can see how a person could park there by mistake if they could not read the sign. However, just from observing the overall context of the fair---how everyone was walking around within such a tight space and cars were virtually no where to be seen---I highly doubt that reading the "No Parking" sign was vital to attending the fair. There were so many identifying factors that made the need for literacy obsolete. If a person wanted to find the booth that was advertising music, then all they would have to do is look for the big banner with pictures of musical instruments, music notes, or musicians. The booth that sold lemonade did have a sign that said "Lemonade, $.50" but a person would only have to see the actual lemons stitting on the booth counter to know that booth's general purpose. Also, why have the sign that says "Lemonade $.50" at all, when there is a person working there who VERBALLY tells you their purpose in being at the fair. For example, I saw the lemons at the booth and walked right up to the woman sitting there and before I could utter a single word, I was asked the question, "Would you like to buy some lemonade? It's only $.50 and the proceeds go to the youth philharmonic." Well, right then and there, it's obvious how little literacy played a role in that situation. I observed how most people paid with cash and coins, but I can see how literacy would play a role if a person tried writing a check to pay for an item. In the case of lemonade, no one used check or credit to pay for their drink; however, I observed some people using their credit card to pay for paintings. So, I have to ask myself...Could an illiterate person pay for a piece of artwork with a credit card? If they knew how to sign their name, then yes. But, would an illiterate person even have a credit card in the first place? Well, writing was needed in some instances at the arts fair. I went up to a jazz booth and asked how could I sign up for their mailing list if I did not know how to read and write. The men at the booth had no idea what I was talking about. I posed a scenario for them. I said, "What if a member of the community really wanted to stay informed on the local jazz events but did not know how to read or write; thus, they could not sign up to be on your mailing list." The men then countered back with, "Well, if they had an address in the first place, they would need to know how to read and write. Plus, why would an illiterate person request printed information in the first place?" I thought that these mens' viewes were very interesting. They posed a lot of great questions. How common is it to find an illiterate person in our community who would actually attend an arts fair and request printed information in the mail? One of the men I spoke with told me that they have never had a single person in all of their years of working at the fair approach them and admit that they were illiterate. I guess at an arts fair literacy is pretty much a given. You wouldn't assume that an illiterate person would approach your booth and purchase something or sign up for a mailing list. There was one instance in which I thought literacy would play an important role, but the volunteer at the fair proved me wrong. At the information booth, there was a written survey on a piece of paper. When I walked up to the booth, the volunteer asked if I would like to fill out a survey about my experience at the fair. I then asked her what accomodations could she make for me if I could not read or write. She seemed stunned at first, but then said, "Well, I could read out the questions for you and then you verbally tell me what you think. Then I will write down your answers and basically fill out the survey myself for you." She proved me wrong. I guess even when it comes to confidential surveys, a person does not need to be able to read or write in order to express their opinions.

Overall, the literacy materials were arranged so that they were not very visible. Yes, the pamphlets, business cards, and menus were physically on the booth, but they weren't the focal point of the booth. Any person who has a history in advertising and marketing would know that small printed materials do not attract people to purchase items from you. You need music, pictures, performances, or activities in order to get people interested. Well, that is what an arts fair is all about. You can go to the arts fair, have a fantastic time, and still not read a single piece of paper. What about people from other countries for whom English is not their native language. Those printed materials, all written in English, would be useless. The only time literacy actually mattered was when a person wanted to take an artist's business card, biography, or an order form along with them. These "big spender" people would of course be able to read and write, especially if they were forking over thousands of dollars for ceramic statues of farm animals. Personally, I think it would be more difficult for visually impaired, hearing impaired, or physically impaired people to navigate their way around the arts fair in comparison to illiterate people. Even young children who typically cannot read or write, were still able to function well and have lots of fun at the arts fair. If ever they had a question about a booth's purpose, all they would have to do is ask their parents, "Mommy, what's that?" or "Mama, can I go see what the other station is?" At an arts fair, a 3 year old child would not care that the watercolor artist was selling artwork at fairs in five other states. The 3 year old child would only care if they had the chance to create their own watercolor painting by physically DOING IT---not reading about it! It's unfortunate that literacy does not play a significant role at a community arts fair. I'm sure the percentage of local community members who attended the fair that weekend was huge. Imagine if instead of an arts fair, they were having a literacy education event and had the same high percentage of participation. Now, that would be incredible!

My First Blog.....Scary!!!!!

Wow! Making a first time blog, knowing that everything I type here can be seen by anyone in the entire world, is a scary thing. I feel that most teachers are afraid to voice their opinions and make them public in fear that parents and administrators will retaliate. After reading the article, That's Online Writing..., I noticed that the teacher had to overcome obstacles that the administrators put in front of her. Of course, there is no doubt in my mind that the administration decided to cut the Talkback Project because they were concerned about the safety of the students. But, I thought it was wonderful how the kids and parents were so passionate in their response to save the blog project. Even though the administration in this article decided to listen to the kids and parents and revive the project, this doesn't always happen in our reality as educators. I agree that there is a gap between digital fluency and traditional literacy skills in our education system. I remember taking a typing class in 5th grade, but that's about it. Most of my computer education occured once my family bought a home computer while I was in middle school. Cassandra's experience with computers is pretty similar to my own. I remember my friends and I using things such as Xanga and LiveJournal; however, I didn't like it as much as Cassandra did. Ironically, I actually preferred to express my opinions and literary creations using good ol' paper and pen. I guess I would have been the one person using "leeches instead of nuclear medicine" as one kid put it. However, I believe in the phrase, "to each, his own." Some people prefer to express their opinions on paper while others like typing on the computer. This just means that we need to utlitize both ways as means of expressing ourselves. Just because we are now focusing on digital fluency does not mean that we should give up entirely on expressing ourselves using pen and paper. Remember to "make new friends, but keep the old." Let's use both mediums in the classroom, especially since it would increase our chance of reaching a variety of learners.